The habits of institution that we have inherited through the European formulas are coded according to a different template than the fivefold one. Christendom churches have generally followed the Bishop-Priest-Deacons model, or the more generic Shepherd-Teacher model (the so-called two  orders of ministry), or the Preacher-Elder model of the Reformed tradition. Most of these, as we have seen, have managed to assiduously script a full APEST typology out of the tradition. The net result is that we don’t know how to even talk about APEST dynamics, let alone implement APEST. We are out of touch with the more instinctive models laced throughout the book of Acts.

As far as I can discern, to reconstitute APEST ministry in the church is going to require at least three levels of work:

APEST and Discipleship

The most basic and fundamental change needs to be bottom-up and take place at the level of discipleship. The main emphasis of biblical teaching is not on knowledge about God but rather emphasizes personal devotion to God, along with, imitation of, and obedience to him.

This imitation is to be attempted by following a right way of living. The word discipleship has its root in the word “to be a learner.” Discipleship involves, then, the way in which one walks—the way that leads to an ever-increasing approximation of God’s actions in the life of the disciple. Following this discipleship approach, the language, concepts, functions, and vocations associated with APEST must become second nature through practice. This is essentially what we in the Forge International tribe call “giving language and license”—we must give people new language, but we must also then give them the license to go and do what God has called them to.

At this level, people must be able to discern and name their own ministry profile, while also understanding and cooperating with the other ministries in the Body. When people do this, they get in touch with their own sense of purpose and destiny. Also, if APEST is indeed a picture of Christ, then all disciples must grow in all these five qualities to be more like him. So we need to further grow in each of the five elements and not allow for people to just be good at one or two. Most training in gifts tends to promote a kind of specialization and leaves people saying, “I’m not gifted in that.” The 5Q approach does away with the isolated individualism and recognizes the source and direction of the fivefold is Christ. (The vocational tools described later in the chapter, along with the statistically reliable APEST vocations test at www.apest.org, will go a long way to helping disciples connect with, and enhance, their own sense of calling.)

APEST at the Local Level

2. The next critical level that needs to be recalibrated to suit APEST dynamics is at the level of the local church or organization. This will involve the leadership of the church/organization coding APEST dynamics into the living culture (the rhythms of the gathered and scattered community) as well as its organizational structures (the programs, policies, and procedures). The idea is to make APEST inevitable in the very culture of the organization/community and inherent in its structures, to gear the church toward greater conformity to Jesus’ pattern of ministry and therefore to its own maturity and
impact. I heartily recommend that you consider using the resource Tim Catchim and I wrote, entitled The Permanent Revolution Playbook. It is a great group resource.

(The tools related to “functions” and “culture”, along with the APEST functions test located at www.5Qtests.com and www.apest.org will also help leadership in this important quest.)

APEST and Systemic Transformation

3. If the first two represent more local, bottom-up approaches to recoding along APEST lines, then the third one relates to the top-down aspects of systemic change. In order to effect system-wide change, leaders need to create a climate of legitimacy at higher levels of the organization through the integration of the APEST theology, language, and practice. Permission has to be given at the macro level for a denomination to engender APEST forms of function and ministry. This is, in my opinion, a mission-critical issue for denominational leaders to pursue if they wish to lead their organizations into a viable future, different from the current one, which is geared toward decline.

Once people in the movement are able to use APEST terms and express the functions without censure, new explorations and deepening of collective understandings of APEST can begin to take place.

Activating change through all three levels will have system-wide impact, and this can be accomplished by:

• enlivening lost truths
• legitimizing new concepts
• repenting of the obsolete (or incomplete) understandings of function and calling
• embracing change
• reshaping culture
• permitting risk
• celebrating progress as it occurs

Even more crucially it will involve discipling not just individuals but the organization itself—creating new habits and patterns of behavior for the whole system. This is the function of new assessments, tools, and practices along with an accompaniment of a coach or guide: at this level of re-scripting or re-discipling, practice does make perfect.


**This post is an excerpt from 5Q: Reactivating The Original Intelligence And Capacity Of The Body Of Christ.

New Coaching Processes on the way! For more information and updates as they occur, please contact us through the form on the Coaching and Training page. We look forward to hearing from you, and more than that, working together to see 5Q help you create new rhythms and paradigms in the churches and organizations you lead.
Alan Hirsch
Alan Hirsch founder of Forge Mission Training Network, 100 Movements, and now 5Qcollective. He is author of numerous award-winning books on movements, organization, and leadership, and teaches extensively across North America, Europe, and Australia.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *